Download PDFOpen PDF in browser

Error Evolution Patterns in Multi-Step Ahead Streamflow Forecasting

10 pagesPublished: September 20, 2018

Abstract

Multi-step ahead streamflow forecasting is of practical interest. We examine the error evolution in multi-step ahead forecasting by conducting six simulation experiments. Within each of these experiments we compare the error evolution patterns created by 16 forecasting methods, when the latter are applied to 2 000 time series. Our findings suggest that the error evolution can differ significantly from the one forecasting method to the other and that some forecasting methods are more useful than others. However, the errors computed at each time step of a forecast horizon for a specific single-case study strongly depend on the case examined and can be either small or large, regardless of the used forecasting method and the time step of interest. This fact is illustrated with a comparative case study using 92 monthly time series of streamflow.

Keyphrases: errors, multi-step ahead forecasting, Recursive method, simulations, time series, uncertainty

In: Goffredo La Loggia, Gabriele Freni, Valeria Puleo and Mauro De Marchis (editors). HIC 2018. 13th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, vol 3, pages 1598--1607

Links:
BibTeX entry
@inproceedings{HIC2018:Error_Evolution_Patterns_in,
  author    = {Georgia Papacharalampous and Hristos Tyralis and Demetris Koutsoyiannis},
  title     = {Error Evolution Patterns in Multi-Step Ahead Streamflow Forecasting},
  booktitle = {HIC 2018. 13th International Conference on Hydroinformatics},
  editor    = {Goffredo La Loggia and Gabriele Freni and Valeria Puleo and Mauro De Marchis},
  series    = {EPiC Series in Engineering},
  volume    = {3},
  pages     = {1598--1607},
  year      = {2018},
  publisher = {EasyChair},
  bibsource = {EasyChair, https://easychair.org},
  issn      = {2516-2330},
  url       = {https://easychair.org/publications/paper/zwGC},
  doi       = {10.29007/84k6}}
Download PDFOpen PDF in browser